Skip to main content
Do checkout my poem section. You are going to love it.

Troubleshooting canceled jobs


Troubleshooting Canceled Jobs in SAP BASIS

I. Understanding Canceled Jobs

  • Definition: A background job in SAP with a Canceled status indicates that it terminated abnormally before successful completion. This can be due to various reasons, from program errors to system resource issues or incorrect configurations.
  • Impact:
    • Business Process Interruption: Critical business processes (e.g., payroll, invoicing, financial postings, material movements) might not complete.
    • Data Inconsistency: Partial updates or missing data.
    • System Instability: Resource contention, short dumps, or database issues if the cancellation is severe or frequent.
    • Alerts & Notifications: Often triggers alerts to Basis teams or functional users.

II. Common Causes of Job Cancellations

  1. Authorization Issues: The job's user lacks the necessary authorizations to execute a program, access tables, or perform certain operations.
  2. Program Errors (ABAP Dumps):
    • Syntax errors (less common for already Released jobs, more for new development).
    • Runtime errors (e.g., MESSAGE_TYPE_X, DB_FATAL_ERROR, DIVISION_BY_ZERO, CONVT_NO_NUMBER, TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED for memory issues).
    • Incorrect data handling in the program.
  3. Incorrect Program Variant: The variant used by the job step has incorrect or inconsistent selection parameters, leading to logic errors in the program.
  4. Resource Issues:
    • Memory: Insufficient extended or heap memory for the background work process (leads to TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED, COMMIT_IN_NO_ORDER).
    • Database: Database issues (lock contention, space issues, performance bottlenecks).
    • Work Processes: All background work processes are busy, leading to job timeout or resource contention (less common for direct cancellation, more for delays).
  5. External Program/Command Failure: If a job step executes an external OS command or program, and that external process fails or the OS user lacks permissions.
  6. Network/Communication Errors: Issues connecting to external systems (RFC, HTTP, database connections).
  7. Data Inconsistency/Integrity: The program encounters unexpected data or data in an inconsistent state, causing it to terminate.
  8. Manual Cancellation: Someone manually canceled the job using SM37 or SM50/SM66. (Usually verifiable from job log).

III. Structured Troubleshooting Steps for Canceled Jobs

The primary tool for troubleshooting is SM37 (Job Overview), but it integrates with other Basis transactions.

  1. Step 1: Initial Investigation in SM37

    • Go to SM37: Enter SM37. Filter by Job Name, User Name (if known), Status: Canceled, and the relevant Date Range.
    • Double-Click the Canceled Job: Open the Job Details.
    • Analyze the Job Log (Crucial First Step):
      • Read the log from bottom-up (newest messages first) or look for keywords like "Error", "Aborted", "Termination", "Dump", "Authorization".
      • The job log usually provides the most direct indication of the problem, e.g., "Program terminated", "System error", "Error in authorization check".
      • Note the program name, step number, and any associated message numbers.
    • Check for Short Dump Link: If the job log indicates a program termination, a Short Dump link will appear. Click it to go to ST22.
    • Check for Spool List: Sometimes the spool list contains messages or partial output that can hint at the problem, especially for reports.
    • Note Job User & Variant: Identify the User under which the job step ran and the Variant used, as these are common sources of issues.

  2. Step 2: Deep Dive into ST22 (If Short Dump Exists)

    • Go to ST22: Or click the Short Dump link from SM37.
    • Analyze the Short Dump:
      • Error Analysis Section: This is the most important section. It explicitly states the error message (e.g., MESSAGE_TYPE_X, TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED, UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION).
      • Termination Point: Shows the ABAP program and line of code where the error occurred. This is crucial for developers.
      • Calling Program / Call Stack: Shows the sequence of programs/functions leading to the error.
      • Active Calls / Events: Contextual information.
      • Contents of System Fields: SY-SUBRC, SY-MSGID, SY-MSGNO, SY-MSGV1-4 can provide context.
      • Choose relevant source code: Often provides the exact code snippet.
    • Identify Error Type:
      • MESSAGE_TYPE_X: Program explicitly terminated (often due to inconsistent data or unhandled error).
      • TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED / NO_ROLL_MEMORY: Memory exhaustion.
      • DB_FATAL_ERROR: Database issues.
      • AUTHORIZATION_FAILED or similar: Authorization issue.
      • UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION: An exception in the program was not handled.

  3. Step 3: Authorization Check (SU53 / ST01)

    • If Job Log/Short Dump points to Authorization:
      • SU53 (Last Failed Authorization Check):
        • Log on as the job user (if it's a dialog user) and immediately run SU53. It will show the last failed authorization check.
        • If not a dialog user, or if you want to check for a past job, run SU53 with your own user, then go to Authorization Check for Other User (you need S_USER_GRP with ACTVT=05 for this).
      • ST01 (Authorization Trace):
        • Activate Trace: Go to ST01. Select Authorization Check. Filter for the Job User.
        • Reproduce Error: Reschedule the job or manually run the program (if safe to do so).
        • Analyze Trace: Immediately deactivate the trace and analyze. It will show all authorization checks, highlighting failures.
    • Resolution: Provide the missing authorization object and its values to the security team to update the job user's role in PFCG.

  4. Step 4: Analyze System Logs (SM21)

    • Go to SM21: Filter by the Date/Time of the job cancellation.
    • Look for Relevant Messages: Search for messages related to:
      • Work process terminations (DPC, DPX).
      • Database errors.
      • Gateway issues (for RFC calls).
      • External command failures.
      • Memory problems.
      • User SY-SUBRC errors.
    • Context: SM21 can provide system-level context not always visible in the job log.

  5. Step 5: Work Process Analysis (SM50 / SM66)

    • Go to SM50 (Local WP) / SM66 (Global WP):
    • Identify the WP: Find the background work process (BTC) that ran the job (can be seen in SM37 job details if still Running or Canceled).
    • Analyze State: Check its Status, Reason, CPU Time, Runtime, Program, Table.
    • Check for Restarted WPs: If the work process itself crashed, it might have restarted.
    • Rationale: Helps confirm if the cancellation was due to a work process crash, resource exhaustion, or a deadlock.

  6. Step 6: Program Variant & Data Check

    • Go to SE38 (or SA38): Enter the program name from the job step.
    • Check Variant: Go to Variants -> Display. Verify if the parameters are correct and logical for the expected data. Often, selection criteria might be too restrictive or incorrect.
    • Data Check: If the variant seems correct, verify the actual data in the database tables the program is supposed to process using SE16N. Is the data there? Is it in the correct format/status?

  7. Step 7: External Command/Program Check (SM69)

    • If an External Command or External Program failed:
      • SM69: Check the definition of the external command. Is it correct?
      • OS Level: Log onto the OS of the target server. Manually try to execute the command/script as the OS user that SAP uses (often sidadm). Check its output and permissions.
      • SM21: Look for more specific OS-level errors in SM21.

IV. Important Configuration to Keep in Mind for Preventing Cancellations

  1. Robust Authorization Design:
    • Least Privilege: Grant job users only the absolute minimum authorizations required (PFCG).
    • Dedicated Batch Users: Use separate technical users for different job categories (e.g., SAP_BATCH_FI, SAP_BATCH_HR) instead of a single SAP_BATCH for everything.
    • Regular Review: Periodically review job user authorizations, especially after upgrades or new implementations.
  2. Resource Management:
    • Memory Parameters: Tune ztta/roll_area, rdisp/roll_max_size, em/initial_size_MB, em/max_size_MB, abap/heap_area_total, abap/heap_area_nondia in RZ10. Ensure sufficient memory for background work processes, especially for data-intensive jobs.
    • Work Process Allocation: Ensure enough background work processes (rdisp/wp_no_btc) are configured in RZ10, potentially dedicating specific application servers for heavy background processing using RZ04 (operation modes).
    • Database Health: Regular database performance tuning, statistics updates, reorgs, and space monitoring.
  3. Job Scheduling Best Practices:
    • Job Class: Assign appropriate job classes (A, B, C) based on priority and resource consumption. Class C jobs should be scheduled during off-peak hours.
    • Target Server: Assign resource-intensive jobs to powerful servers or servers with dedicated background work processes.
    • Dependency Management: Use After Job or After Event conditions for dependent jobs to ensure correct sequencing.
    • Error Handling in Programs: Encourage developers to implement robust error handling in ABAP programs (e.g., TRY...CATCH blocks, custom error messages, logging to application logs (SLG1)).
  4. Data Quality & Validation:
    • Implement data validation checks at the input stage of programs to prevent unexpected data leading to dumps.
    • Ensure source data consistency.
  5. Proactive Monitoring & Alerting:
    • Solution Manager: Configure Solution Manager's Application Operations to automatically alert Basis teams (email, SMS) when critical jobs cancel or run for too long.
    • CCMS (RZ20): Set up CCMS alerts for job statuses.
    • Job Log Analysis: Regularly review SM37 for canceled jobs and take corrective action.
  6. Regular Housekeeping Jobs:
    • Ensure SAP_REORG_JOBS (RSBTCDEL2) and SAP_REORG_SPOOLS (RSPO0041) run daily to keep database tables clean, improving SM37 performance and reducing potential issues.
  7. Documentation: Maintain comprehensive documentation for all critical background jobs, their purpose, dependencies, expected runtime, and common troubleshooting steps.

10 Interview Questions and Answers (One-Liner) for Troubleshooting Canceled Jobs

  1. Q: What is the first step when a job cancels in SAP?
    • A: Check the Job Log in SM37.
  2. Q: Which transaction do you use to analyze ABAP short dumps?
    • A: ST22.
  3. Q: What does TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED in a short dump typically indicate?
    • A: Memory exhaustion (usually Extended or Heap Memory).
  4. Q: How do you check the last failed authorization check for a job user?
    • A: SU53 (as the job user or for another user with proper authorization).
  5. Q: Which transaction allows you to trace authorization checks for a specific user?
    • A: ST01.
  6. Q: What is SM21 used for in job troubleshooting?
    • A: To check system logs for system-level errors or warnings related to the job.
  7. Q: If an external OS command fails in a job step, where do you check its definition?
    • A: SM69.
  8. Q: What does it mean if a job log indicates "MESSAGE_TYPE_X"?
    • A: The ABAP program explicitly terminated itself, often due to an unhandled error or inconsistent data.
  9. Q: What is the primary cause of a job cancellation if SU53 shows a missing object?
    • A: Authorization issue.
  10. Q: How can you check which work process executed a canceled job?
    • A: In SM37 Job Details (though the work process might no longer be visible in SM50 if it has terminated).

5 Scenario-Based Hard Questions and Answers for Troubleshooting Canceled Jobs

  1. Scenario: A critical month-end financial reconciliation job (ZFI_MONTH_END) has been consistently canceling on the first business day of the month for the last three months. The Job Log shows MESSAGE_TYPE_X, and ST22 reveals a short dump UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION in a standard SAP function module FI_POSTING_CHECK. The job user SAP_BATCH_FI has full access to the relevant company codes and GL accounts. Other jobs run by SAP_BATCH_FI are fine.

    • Q: Based on the information, what's your hypothesis for the cancellation, and what detailed steps would you take to confirm it and provide a solution?
    • A:
      • Hypothesis: The UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION in a standard SAP function module (FI_POSTING_CHECK) and the MESSAGE_TYPE_X termination, despite the job user having full access, strongly suggest a data inconsistency or a specific data scenario that the standard function module cannot handle gracefully. Since it happens only month-end, it likely relates to specific data from the previous month's closing.
      • Detailed Steps to Confirm & Solve:
        1. Immediate ST22 Analysis (Deeper Dive):
          • Go to ST22 for the UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION dump.
          • Focus on: The Error Analysis section for the exact exception class, Calling Program/Call Stack (to see what called FI_POSTING_CHECK), and Contents of System Fields (especially if any internal tables or variables are shown that might hold the problematic data).
          • Crucially: Look for any variables or data records mentioned in the dump or in the surrounding code that led to the exception. This might indicate the specific problematic document number, line item, or GL account.
        2. Analyze Job Log (SM37) for Context:
          • Review the Job Log of ZFI_MONTH_END leading up to the dump. Are there any warning messages immediately preceding the dump? Does it indicate which document or set of documents it was processing at the time of failure?
        3. Variant Check (SE38 for ZFI_MONTH_END):
          • Verify the Variant used by ZFI_MONTH_END for the month-end run. Ensure all selection parameters (e.g., date ranges, document types, company codes) are correct and logically consistent with month-end processing. An incorrect date range could inadvertently select problematic data.
        4. Reproduce in Quality/Development System (Crucial):
          • Action: If possible, copy the exact data environment (problematic documents/transactions) from production to a Quality (QAS) or Development (DEV) system.
          • Action: Schedule ZFI_MONTH_END with the same variant in QAS/DEV. If it dumps, then you have a reproducible scenario.
          • Action: Debug the program (SM36 -> Job -> Debug for Released job or SE38 with ZFI_MONTH_END and the problematic variant) to step through the FI_POSTING_CHECK call and identify the specific data causing the exception.
        5. Data Investigation (SE16N / Functional Team):
          • Once the problematic data (e.g., document number, line item) is identified from ST22 or debugging:
            • Use SE16N to view the master data or transactional data involved.
            • Engage the Functional Finance team to review this data. They can confirm if it's correct, explain why it might be inconsistent, or identify if it's an edge case.
        6. Solutioning:
          • If Data Issue: The solution might involve correcting the problematic data (if it's an isolated inconsistency) or adapting the program ZFI_MONTH_END or its variant to handle such data scenarios (e.g., exclude certain data, add more robust checks).
          • If SAP Bug: If the data is confirmed consistent and it's a standard function module, search SAP Notes (support.sap.com) using keywords from the dump (UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION, FI_POSTING_CHECK, program name, error message). There might be a known bug or a required support package.
          • If Program Enhancement/Missing Logic: Work with the ABAP development team to modify ZFI_MONTH_END to either:
            • Add a TRY...CATCH block around the FI_POSTING_CHECK call to gracefully handle the exception and log the problematic data.
            • Implement additional data validation before calling the standard function.
        7. Retest: Once a fix (data correction, program change, SAP Note application) is implemented, thoroughly retest the job in QAS before deploying to production.

  2. Scenario: A large data extraction job (Z_BW_EXTRACT) consistently cancels with TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED during its execution. This happens particularly on weekends when other large batch jobs are also running. The system has 128GB RAM, and abap/heap_area_total is set to 2GB, em/initial_size_MB is 4096, em/max_size_MB is 8192. The rdisp/wp_no_btc is 6.

    • Q: Explain the cause of this cancellation and propose a comprehensive strategy, including parameter adjustments and scheduling changes, to prevent future occurrences without reducing the extracted data volume.
    • A:
      • Cause: TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED indicates that the background work process running Z_BW_EXTRACT exhausted its assigned memory resources (specifically, extended memory, then heap memory). This happens when a program tries to allocate more internal table memory than available. The fact that it occurs on weekends with other large jobs suggests that the overall system memory is under pressure or specific work process memory limits are hit.
        • abap/heap_area_total = 2GB and em/max_size_MB = 8GB (meaning max 8GB extended memory per user, then 2GB heap). While the total RAM is 128GB, the per-work process memory limits might be insufficient for this very large data extraction.
      • Comprehensive Prevention Strategy:
        1. Analyze Current Memory Usage (SM04 / ST02 / SM50):
          • Action: During peak load or when Z_BW_EXTRACT is running, monitor SM04 to see total extended/heap memory usage, and SM50 to see individual work process memory consumption.
          • Action: Check ST02 (Current Parameters -> Extended Memory, Heap Memory) for "swaps" or high allocations, indicating exhaustion.
          • Rationale: Confirm which memory area is being exhausted and overall system memory pressure.
        2. Adjust ABAP Memory Parameters (Instance Profile RZ10):
          • Action: Increase abap/heap_area_nondia (heap memory for non-dialog work processes, where Z_BW_EXTRACT runs). This parameter is per background work process. Increase it (e.g., from default or current value) in increments of 512MB or 1GB, as needed, after analysis.
          • Action: Increase abap/heap_area_total (total heap memory available to all non-dialog work processes combined). This must be higher than the sum of abap/heap_area_nondia multiplied by max concurrent non-dialog WPs.
          • Action: Consider increasing em/max_size_MB if Extended Memory is the primary bottleneck, but usually heap memory is hit first for large internal tables.
          • Rationale: Provides more memory to the individual background work process to handle large internal tables without dumping.
          • Note: These changes require an SAP instance restart.
        3. Dedicated Background Server (Operation Modes RZ04):
          • Action: If not already, configure an operation mode for weekends that dedicates a specific application server (e.g., APPSERV_BATCH) with a higher number of background work processes (rdisp/wp_no_btc) and more generous abap/heap_area_nondia for that instance.
          • Action: Assign Z_BW_EXTRACT to run on this dedicated APPSERV_BATCH using the Target Server option in SM36.
          • Rationale: Isolates memory-intensive jobs to specific servers, preventing them from impacting other critical processes and giving them guaranteed resources.
        4. Optimize Z_BW_EXTRACT Program (Developer Involvement):
          • Action: Though the request stated "without reducing data volume," work with developers to optimize the ABAP program. This could involve:
            • Using SELECT...PACKAGE SIZE to process data in smaller chunks.
            • Optimizing internal table usage (e.g., STANDARD TABLE vs. HASHED TABLE, FREE internal tables when no longer needed).
            • Streamlining database access to reduce memory footprint.
          • Rationale: Code optimization is often the most sustainable solution for memory issues.
        5. Job Class and Scheduling Review:
          • Action: Ensure Z_BW_EXTRACT is Class C (Low Priority) and scheduled during off-peak hours (e.g., late night Saturday/Sunday).
          • Action: Ensure no other Class A or B jobs unnecessarily overlap or consume excessive resources during this window.
          • Rationale: Proper scheduling minimizes contention with higher-priority jobs.

  3. Scenario: You have a new SAP S/4HANA system. An hourly integration job (Z_INT_PROCESS) to an external CRM system has started canceling with "Authorization Error" in the Job Log and ST22 dump AUTHORIZATION_FAILED. The job user SAP_INT_BATCH was copied from the previous ECC system, and worked fine there. SU53 shows missing authorization object S_C_EDI with ACTVT='03', EDI_MSGTYP='ORDERS', and EDI_FCCODE='RFC'.

    • Q: What is the specific reason for this authorization failure in S/4HANA, and how would you resolve it, considering it worked in ECC?
    • A:
      • Specific Reason for Failure:
        • The authorization object S_C_EDI is primarily associated with EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) and IDoc processing. The values EDI_MSGTYP='ORDERS' and EDI_FCCODE='RFC' further point to an attempt to process or send ORDERS IDocs via RFC.
        • The most likely reason it worked in ECC but fails in S/4HANA is simplification and re-architecting in S/4HANA for specific functionalities. While S_C_EDI still exists, the underlying calls or the way IDoc processing is handled in S/4HANA might be stricter, or the new integration process in S/4HANA might be directly invoking this specific authorization check where the old ECC process did not (or used a different underlying mechanism). It's possible the new integration logic in S/4HANA for Z_INT_PROCESS now directly triggers a stricter check for IDoc-related operations that wasn't previously in play or was covered by broader authorizations in ECC.
      • Resolution Steps:
        1. Confirm S_C_EDI Necessity:
          • Action: Engage the ABAP developer responsible for Z_INT_PROCESS and the functional team. Confirm if this integration is indeed involving IDoc processing (specifically ORDERS IDocs).
          • Rationale: Ensure the authorization object being requested truly aligns with the intended functionality. Sometimes, MESSAGE_TYPE_X dumps due to incorrect data can lead to misleading authorization check errors.
        2. Add Authorization to Job User Role (PFCG):
          • Action: Go to PFCG. Find the role assigned to SAP_INT_BATCH (e.g., Z_BATCH_INT_ROLE).
          • Action: Add the authorization object S_C_EDI to this role.
          • Action: Provide the missing values: ACTVT='03' (Display/Read access - though for processing, it might need 01 (Create) or 02 (Change), depending on Z_INT_PROCESS's actual function with the IDoc), EDI_MSGTYP='ORDERS', EDI_FCCODE='RFC'.
          • Action: Generate the profile for the role.
          • Action: Ensure the role is assigned to SAP_INT_BATCH (if it was removed or a new role is created).
          • Rationale: Granting the specific authorization allows the job user to pass the check.
        3. Retest the Job:
          • Action: Reschedule Z_INT_PROCESS in SM36 or SM37 and monitor for successful completion.
        4. Long-Term (S/4HANA Simplification Item Review):
          • Action: Review SAP's Simplification List for S/4HANA relevant to EDI, IDoc, and Finance integrations. This can explain why authorization checks or processes have changed from ECC to S/4HANA, helping to prevent future such issues.
          • Action: For future S/4HANA integrations, ensure the security team uses S/4HANA-specific best practices and roles, rather than directly porting ECC roles, due to re-architecting of certain modules.

  4. Scenario: An external vendor's SFTP server sends daily product updates. An SAP background job (Z_PRODUCT_LOAD_SFTP) runs an ABAP program that calls an external OS command (SFTP_GET_FILE) via SM69 to fetch the file. Recently, this job started canceling with an error in the Job Log indicating "External program terminated with exit code 1" and no relevant ST22 dump. SM21 logs show "CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPRcvEx' : cmRc=20 thRc=456#Error in program call".

    • Q: What is the most likely cause of this specific CPIC-CALL error in conjunction with "exit code 1", and how would you troubleshoot and resolve it from an SAP Basis perspective?
    • A:
      • Most Likely Cause:
        • "External program terminated with exit code 1" from the job log means the SFTP_GET_FILE OS command (or the script it executes) failed at the operating system level.
        • The CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPRcvEx' : cmRc=20 thRc=456#Error in program call message in SM21 (or sometimes in the job log) specifically points to an issue where SAP tried to execute an external program (via its Gateway/Host Agent) but the execution environment or permissions on the OS level were incorrect. thRc=456 often signifies "Program not found or not executable".
        • Therefore, the most likely cause is permissions or path issues for the external SFTP_GET_FILE script/executable on the operating system level, or the script itself failed (e.g., SFTP connection issue, invalid credentials within the script, file not found on source SFTP).
      • Troubleshooting & Resolution Steps:
        1. Verify SM69 Command Definition:
          • Action: Go to SM69. Display the definition of SFTP_GET_FILE.
          • Check: Is the External Program path correct? Is it UNIX or WINDOWS specified correctly? Are parameters correctly passed?
          • Rationale: Ensure SAP is attempting to call the correct external program.
        2. OS Level Test (Crucial):
          • Action: Log onto the SAP application server OS where the background job runs (this is the Target Server from SM36/SM37 if specified, or any server with a background work process).
          • Action: Identify the OS user under which the SAP system's Gateway process (gwrd) or SAP Host Agent (saphostctrl) typically executes external commands (often sidadm for the SAP instance).
          • Action: As this OS user, manually execute the exact external command/script defined in SM69 (e.g., /usr/bin/sshpass -p 'password' sftp user@host:/path/to/file /local/path).
          • Rationale: This directly simulates what SAP is trying to do. Look for:
            • "Permission denied" errors: The OS user might not have execute permission on the script or read/write permission on target/source directories.
            • "Command not found": The path to sftp or other tools within the script might be incorrect or not in the OS user's PATH environment variable.
            • SFTP-specific errors: If the script executes but fails, it indicates issues like incorrect SFTP host, port, username, password, network, or certificate issues.
            • Logs: Check the SFTP_GET_FILE script's internal logs (if it has any).
        3. Check OS File/Directory Permissions:
          • Action: Verify execute permissions on the SFTP_GET_FILE script itself (e.g., chmod +x script.sh).
          • Action: Verify read/write permissions on the source and target directories for the sidadm user.
          • Rationale: A common cause of thRc=456.
        4. Review Network/Firewall for SFTP:
          • Action: Confirm network connectivity from the SAP server to the external SFTP server on the correct port (usually 22). Use telnet <SFTP_HOST> 22 from the SAP OS level.
          • Action: Check firewall rules (both on SAP server and corporate firewall) if the connection is blocked.
          • Rationale: SFTP connection failures are a common root cause if basic execution works.
        5. Secure Credentials (if hardcoded):
          • Action: If the script has hardcoded SFTP credentials, this is a security risk. Recommend using SSH keys for authentication or fetching credentials securely.
          • Rationale: While not causing the thRc=456 directly, it's a critical best practice.
        6. Resolution:
          • Based on the OS level test, correct the identified issue: fix permissions, correct paths in SM69 or the script, update SFTP credentials, or resolve network issues.
          • Retest the job in SM37.

  5. Scenario: A daily job SAP_REORG_JOBS (program RSBTCDEL2) is supposed to delete job logs older than 7 days. For the past week, it has been canceling with no ST22 dump, but the Job Log shows "Database error occurred when accessing table TBTCO" followed by "SQL error 12345 in DBLIB: Database is full or transaction log is full". SM21 confirms the database full errors. SM37 performance is also degrading significantly.

    • Q: Diagnose the precise problem leading to this cancellation and propose a multi-faceted solution covering immediate, short-term, and long-term actions from a Basis perspective.
    • A:

      • Precise Problem: The SAP_REORG_JOBS job is failing because the database is running out of space, specifically for TBTCO table (which stores job headers and logs) or its transaction log. This is a vicious cycle: The job designed to clean up database space is failing because there's no space. The SM37 performance degradation is a direct consequence of a massive TBTCO table due to no cleanup.

      • Multi-faceted Solution:

        I. Immediate Action (To get SAP_REORG_JOBS running and free minimal space):

        1. Extend Database/Log Files:
          • Action: Coordinate with the DBA team (or perform if Basis has DB admin rights) to immediately extend the database data files or transaction log files to create temporary space. This is the fastest way to get the system operational.
          • Rationale: Provides breathing room for the cleanup job to run.
        2. Run SAP_REORG_JOBS Manually with Aggressive Variant:
          • Action: Go to SM36. Select SAP_REORG_JOBS. Click Repeat Scheduling.
          • Action: In the step details, for RSBTCDEL2, change the Variant to a new, very aggressive variant (e.g., Z_URGENT_DELETE) that deletes jobs older than 1-2 days (very short retention).
          • Action: Schedule it Immediate.
          • Rationale: Once space is available, running with a very short retention will quickly delete a large number of old records from TBTCO, freeing significant space.

        II. Short-Term Actions (Stabilization and Preventing Recurrence):

        1. Optimize SAP_REORG_JOBS Variant:
          • Action: Review the variant of SAP_REORG_JOBS (program RSBTCDEL2). Ensure it is set to delete logs older than a reasonable period (e.g., 7 days, as intended, or even less if volume is very high).
          • Action: Ensure the job runs daily during off-peak hours.
          • Rationale: Consistent, efficient cleanup.
        2. Optimize SAP_REORG_SPOOLS (RSPO0041):
          • Action: Ensure SAP_REORG_SPOOLS is running daily with an appropriate short retention period (e.g., 3-7 days). Spool growth can also contribute significantly to database size.
          • Rationale: Addresses another major source of uncontrolled database growth.
        3. Database Index Reorganization/Statistics Update:
          • Action: Coordinate with DBAs to reorganize/rebuild indexes on TBTCO and TBTCP tables, and update statistics.
          • Rationale: Improves query performance for SM37 and other background processing.
        4. Review SM37 Usage:
          • Action: Educate users to use narrower date ranges in SM37 selection to improve performance while DB is being optimized.

        III. Long-Term Actions (Sustainable Solution & Proactive Management):

        1. Monitor Database Space Proactively:
          • Action: Implement robust database space monitoring and alerting using tools like DB02, DBACOCKPIT, or external monitoring solutions. Set up thresholds for alerts when free space drops below a critical percentage.
          • Rationale: Early warning system for future space issues.
        2. Review rdisp/wp_no_btc_max_duration:
          • Action: This parameter defines how long a background work process can run before being forcibly terminated. While not directly causing the DB full error, very long-running jobs can generate huge logs very quickly. Review if specific, very long-running jobs need optimization.
          • Rationale: Ensures unruly jobs don't monopolize resources or generate excessive logs.
        3. Consider SAP Archiving for Historical Data:
          • Action: If business or audit requirements necessitate keeping job logs/spools for very long periods (e.g., years), explore SAP archiving (e.g., ILM) to move this data off the live database to a cheaper storage.
          • Rationale: The ultimate solution for long-term data retention without impacting live system performance.
        4. Regular DB Maintenance Plan:
          • Action: Establish and adhere to a regular database maintenance plan (backups, consistency checks, reorgs, statistics updates, space monitoring).
          • Rationale: Essential for overall database health and system stability.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An experiment with the life

"Best Thing about experiment is that it only improves the outcome." Well, I am Rakshit, hope you already know. I am not special and surely not especially gifted. Neither things go according to my wish. Neither I am the best writer.  But I am myself who is totally unique from anyone else. And I am Rakshit Ranjan Singh. I have my own fun, fights and fall in the most fundamentalistic way. Mechanical is my degree. IT is my Job. Beauty in nature is what I search. Words of my heart are what I write. Four different things I carry on my shoulder and a smile on my face, hope you might have seen that. What do I care for? Family, friends and nature. Do I have regrets? More than I can imagine. Let us move further to see what really is my life.
Read more

Learn Java

Hello Friends, You might already know what Java is. Without taking much of your time, I would like to ask you to please click below if you are ready to learn it from end to end. The Material over here is available on the internet and is free to access.  I would request you to bookmark this page and follow it. Please comment if you are happy with the learning. click here
Post a Comment
Read more

Driving

My Driving Journey: From Zero to (Almost) Hero! Hello everyone! I'm excited to share my ongoing adventure of learning to drive. It's been a mix of nervous excitement, hilarious near-misses, and the slow but steady feeling of progress. Buckle up, because here's a peek into my journey behind the wheel! The First Lesson: Clutch Confusion! My first time in the driver's seat was... memorable. Let's just say the clutch and I weren't immediate friends. Lots of jerky starts and a few stalls later, I began to understand the delicate dance between the pedals. My instructor was incredibly patient (thank goodness!). Mastering the Steering Wheel (Sort Of) Steering seemed straightforward enough, but navigating turns smoothly was a different story. I definitely had a few moments of feeling like I was wrestling with the wheel. Slowly but...
Post a Comment
Read more