Configuring high availability (HA)

Configuring High Availability (HA) in SAP BASIS

High Availability (HA) ensures that your SAP system remains operational even if individual components fail within a single data center. It's about redundancy and automatic failover.

I. Core Components for HA in SAP

For HA, we primarily focus on three critical components that, without redundancy, would lead to a system outage:

Database Management System (DBMS): The heart of your SAP system, storing all business data. DBMS HA relies on database-specific clustering or replication features.
ABAP SAP Central Services (ASCS) / Java Central Services (JCS): This is the Single Point of Failure (SPOF) for the SAP system.
- Message Server (MS): Handles communication between application servers and balances user load (for SAP GUI via logon groups).
- Enqueue Server (ES): Manages logical locks on SAP objects to ensure data consistency.
- Enqueue Replication Server (ERS): A crucial component for ASCS/JCS HA, responsible for replicating the Enqueue lock table to prevent data loss in case of ASCS/JCS failure.
Shared Storage: A centralized storage solution accessible by all potential cluster nodes, holding global SAP files (/sapmnt/<SID>) and often database files (if not using native database replication that provides shared-nothing architecture).

II. HA Architecture Overview

A typical SAP HA setup involves:

Two or more physical servers (Cluster Nodes): These servers are part of a cluster.
Cluster Software: Manages the resources (virtual IPs, SAP instances, database instances) and handles failover.
Virtual Hostnames and IPs: Resources are accessed via virtual names, allowing them to float between physical servers.
Shared Storage: Accessed by the active node.

III. HA Strategies and Configuration

HA is achieved through a combination of clustering, redundancy, and load balancing.

1. Clustering for ASCS/JCS and Database

This is the backbone of SAP HA. A software cluster ensures that if one server fails, the services running on it automatically move to a healthy server.

Common Cluster Software:
- Linux: Pacemaker with Corosync (often part of SLES HAE or RHEL HA Add-on).
- Windows: Windows Server Failover Clustering (WSFC).
- Vendor-Specific: HP Serviceguard, IBM PowerHA, Veritas Cluster Server.
Clustering Models:
- Active/Passive (Failover Cluster): One node is active, running the primary services (ASCS, DB). The other is passive, monitoring and ready to take over.
  - Pros: Simpler to configure and manage.
  - Cons: Resources on the passive node are idle. Short downtime during failover.
- Active/Active: Both nodes are active, running services. Can be complex. Sometimes used for database replication scenarios where both nodes host a database instance.
Components in Cluster Resource Groups:
- Virtual IP Address: The IP address that clients use to connect to the ASCS/Database. This IP moves with the resource group.
- Virtual Hostname: Corresponds to the virtual IP. Used in SAP profiles.
- Shared Disk Resource: The cluster manages access to the shared storage (e.g., G:\ drive in Windows, /sapmnt/<SID> mount in Linux) where ASCS profiles and global files reside.
- SAP ASCS Instance: The cluster monitors and starts/stops the ASCS instance.
- SAP ERS Instance: The cluster monitors and starts/stops the ERS instance.
- Database Instance: The cluster monitors and starts/stops the database instance (unless using native database HA like HSR, AlwaysOn AG which have their own failover).
Fencing / STONITH (Shoot The Other Node In The Head):
- Purpose: A crucial cluster mechanism to prevent a "split-brain" scenario where both nodes incorrectly believe they are the active node, leading to data corruption.
- Mechanism: When a node fails or loses communication, fencing physically isolates it (e.g., power cycle, storage access revocation) to ensure only one node has control of shared resources.
- Configuration: Implemented at the cluster software level (e.g., iLO, IPMI, SAN-level fencing).

2. Enqueue Replication Server (ERS) for ASCS/JCS HA

Purpose: To provide a robust failover for the Enqueue Server, ensuring no loss of lock entries during an ASCS/JCS failure.
Deployment: ERS is a separate SAP instance that must be installed on a different physical host than the ASCS/JCS instance. Ideally, on the secondary cluster node.
How it works:
1. The ERS instance continuously receives and stores a copy of the Enqueue lock table from the primary Enqueue Server.
2. If the ASCS/JCS host fails, the cluster software:
  - First, brings the ERS instance online on a surviving cluster node.
  - The ERS recovers the last known state of the Enqueue table.
  - Then, the ASCS/JCS instance is brought online on a surviving cluster node.
  - The ASCS/JCS's Enqueue Server gets its initial lock table from the now-active ERS instance.
  - Once the ASCS/JCS Enqueue Server is fully up, the ERS can be shut down (its job is done).
Configuration: Managed by the cluster software, ensuring ERS is brought up before ASCS/JCS during a failover scenario.

3. Database HA (DBMS Specific)

The approach to database HA depends on the specific database being used.

SAP HANA:
- HANA System Replication (HSR): The primary method.
  - Synchronous Replication (Mode=sync, Operation Mode=logreplay): Provides zero data loss (RPO=0). Logs are written to memory on the secondary before commit on primary. Used for HA within a data center.
  - Automatic Host Auto-Failover: For intra-host failures (within a single HANA scale-out system), not inter-host HA for the entire system.
- Clustering (Pacemaker/WSFC): Often used in conjunction with HSR (active/passive) to manage the virtual IP and start/stop HANA on failover. The cluster monitors the HSR status.
Oracle:
- Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC): Active/active clustering for high scalability and HA.
- Oracle Data Guard: Physical Standby for HA/DR (can be synchronous for HA).
SQL Server:
- AlwaysOn Availability Groups (AGs): High availability and disaster recovery solution. Can be configured for synchronous replication for HA.
- Failover Cluster Instances (FCIs): Active/passive clustering for the SQL Server instance itself.
IBM DB2 / Sybase ASE: Have their own specific HA technologies.

4. Application Server Redundancy and Load Balancing

Dialog Instances: These are typically deployed across multiple physical hosts. They are inherently redundant. If one application server fails, users are simply directed to other active application servers.
Load Balancing (for SAP GUI):
- SAP Message Server: Manages logon groups (SMLG). When a user logs in via SAP GUI, the Message Server directs them to the least loaded or best-suited application server in the logon group.
Load Balancing (for HTTP/HTTPS - Web GUI, Fiori):
- SAP Web Dispatcher: A software-based load balancer that sits in front of the application servers. It directs HTTP/HTTPS requests to available application servers.
- Web Dispatcher HA: For the Web Dispatcher itself, deploy two or more Web Dispatchers in a cluster (using virtual IP) or behind a hardware load balancer for its own HA.

IV. Important Configuration to Keep in Mind

Virtual Hostnames and IPs:
- Definition: Define these in your DNS. All SAP profiles and client connections should point to these virtual names/IPs, not the physical ones.
- Purpose: Allows services to seamlessly float between physical hosts during a failover.
- Configuration: Managed by the cluster software.
Shared Storage:
- Requirement: Essential for /sapmnt/<SID>/profile, /sapmnt/<SID>/global, kernel executables (in /sapmnt/SYS/exe/run), and ASCS/JCS specific files.
- Type: Can be NFS, Fibre Channel SAN, iSCSI SAN, or a clustered file system (e.g., GFS2 for Linux).
- HA for Shared Storage: The shared storage solution itself must be highly available (e.g., redundant controllers, multi-pathing).
SAP Profile Parameters (Key for HA):
- DEFAULT.PFL:
  - rdisp/mshost = <ASCS_VIRTUAL_HOSTNAME>: Specifies the Message Server.
  - enq/serverhost = <ASCS_VIRTUAL_HOSTNAME>: Specifies the Enqueue Server.
  - enq/serverinst = <ASCS_INSTANCE_NUMBER>: Specifies the ASCS instance number.
- Instance Profiles (<SID>_ASCS<NN>_<ASCS_VIRTUAL_HOSTNAME>):
  - Contain parameters specific to the ASCS instance.
- Database Parameters: Point to the database's virtual hostname or listener.
- SAP Web Dispatcher Profiles: Point to the Message Server and application server Message Servers.
- Login Groups (SMLG): Ensure logon groups are correctly configured to point to available application servers.
Cluster Software Configuration:
- Resource Definitions: Accurately define all cluster resources (virtual IP, shared disk, ASCS service, ERS service, DB service) and their dependencies.
- Monitor Resources: Configure aggressive monitoring (e.g., ping checks for IP, service checks for SAP processes) to detect failures quickly.
- Fencing/STONITH: Implement and thoroughly test fencing methods to prevent split-brain.
- Failover Policy: Define the preferred order of nodes for failover if multiple healthy nodes exist.
Network Configuration:
- Redundant NICs: Each server should have multiple network interface cards (NICs) configured for bonding or teaming to provide network redundancy.
- Redundant Switches/Routers: The underlying network infrastructure must also be redundant.
- Firewall Rules: Ensure all necessary ports (SAP ports, database ports, cluster communication ports) are open between all cluster nodes, application servers, and storage.
Operating System Setup:
- Consistent OS: All cluster nodes should have identical OS versions, patch levels, and configurations.
- Kernel Parameters: Tune OS kernel parameters as per SAP and database vendor recommendations.
- Hostfile/DNS: Maintain consistency, ensuring virtual hostnames resolve correctly.
SAP Installation Tools:
- sapinst: Used for installing HA-specific SAP components (ASCS/ERS on cluster nodes). Follow the HA-specific guides provided by SAP.
- SAP Notes: Always refer to the latest SAP Notes for HA setup with your specific OS, DB, and SAP version.

V. Testing and Maintenance

Regular Failover Testing: Crucial to validate your HA setup. Test planned (graceful switchover) and unplanned (simulate power failure) scenarios.
Application-Level Testing: After a failover, ensure SAP transactions and custom programs function correctly.
Patching and Upgrades: Plan patching and upgrades carefully in a clustered environment, ensuring services can be moved or stopped gracefully.
Monitoring: Implement proactive monitoring for cluster status, resource health, and replication status (e.g., using SAP Solution Manager, OS-level tools, cluster management interfaces).

30 Interview Questions and Answers (One-Liner) for Configuring High Availability (HA) in SAP BASIS

Q: What is the primary goal of High Availability (HA)?
- A: To minimize downtime from localized failures within a data center.
Q: Which SAP component is the Single Point of Failure (SPOF) in an SAP system for HA?
- A: ASCS (ABAP SAP Central Services) or JCS (Java Central Services).
Q: What does ERS stand for in SAP HA?
- A: Enqueue Replication Server.
Q: What is the main purpose of ERS?
- A: To prevent loss of Enqueue lock entries during ASCS failover.
Q: Name two common Linux clustering solutions for SAP HA.
- A: Pacemaker and Corosync (or SLES HAE, RHEL HA Add-on).
Q: What is WSFC?
- A: Windows Server Failover Clustering.
Q: What is the purpose of using virtual hostnames/IPs in HA?
- A: To allow services to float to another physical host without reconfiguring clients.
Q: Which SAP profile parameter points to the Message Server host?
- A: rdisp/mshost.
Q: What does enq/serverhost parameter signify in an HA setup?
- A: It points to the virtual hostname of the Enqueue Server (ASCS).
Q: How does SAP Web Dispatcher contribute to HA?
- A: It acts as a software load balancer for HTTP/HTTPS requests, distributing workload across application servers.
Q: What is the purpose of STONITH in a cluster setup?
- A: To prevent split-brain scenarios by ensuring a failed node is truly shut down.
Q: How do you perform load balancing for SAP GUI users?
- A: Via Logon Groups in SMLG and the Message Server.
Q: Which file system is commonly used for SAP global directories (/sapmnt) in a clustered environment?
- A: NFS (Network File System) or a clustered file system.
Q: What is the difference between active/passive and active/active clustering?
- A: Active/passive has one active node and one standby; active/active has both nodes actively participating in workload/services.
Q: What are the two main components within the ASCS instance for HA?
- A: Message Server and Enqueue Server.
Q: Where is the ERS instance typically installed relative to the ASCS instance?
- A: On a different physical host than the ASCS.
Q: How are multiple application servers inherently made highly available?
- A: By their redundancy; if one fails, users are routed to others.
Q: What is the role of DNS in an HA setup?
- A: To map virtual hostnames to the correct active virtual IP.
Q: What is a "resource group" in clustering?
- A: A collection of related resources (IP, disk, service) that failover together.
Q: Why are redundant NICs (Network Interface Cards) important for HA?
- A: To provide network path redundancy and prevent single points of network failure.
Q: What does "split-brain" refer to in clustering?
- A: When both cluster nodes incorrectly believe they are the active node, leading to data corruption.
Q: What is HSR in the context of SAP HANA HA?
- A: HANA System Replication.
Q: Which HSR mode provides zero data loss for HA within a data center?
- A: Synchronous (Mode=sync, Operation Mode=logreplay).
Q: What is an example of a hardware-based HA solution at the storage layer?
- A: SAN (Storage Area Network) with redundant controllers.
Q: What sapinst option is used for installing ASCS/ERS in an HA environment?
- A: "High-Availability System" or specific "Add-in Instance (ASCS/ERS)" options.
Q: What is the importance of regular failover testing?
- A: To validate the HA setup and ensure it performs as expected in a real failure.
Q: Can the Enqueue Server run on the same host as the ERS?
- A: No, they must run on different hosts for redundancy.
Q: What is the general RPO for a well-configured HA solution?
- A: Near-zero or zero data loss.
Q: What is the general RTO for a well-configured HA solution?
- A: Minutes to a few hours.
Q: What are "dependencies" in cluster resource configuration?
- A: The order in which resources must start (e.g., IP must be online before ASCS service starts).

5 Scenario-Based Hard Questions and Answers for Configuring High Availability (HA) in SAP BASIS

Scenario: Your company has recently implemented an SAP S/4HANA system on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) with a HANA database. You have configured Pacemaker for ASCS/ERS HA and synchronous HANA System Replication (HSR) for database HA. During a planned failover test of the ASCS instance, the virtual IP correctly moves to the secondary node, but the Enqueue Server resource consistently fails to start with a generic "resource failed to start" error in the cluster logs. The SAP ASCS dev_ms and dev_enq logs are empty, and sapstartsrv process is not running.
- Q: What is the most likely root cause for the Enqueue Server not starting, given these symptoms, and what specific troubleshooting steps would you take at the OS and cluster level?
- A:
  - Most Likely Root Cause: The most likely root cause is a problem with the shared file system (/sapmnt/<SID>) access or permissions on the secondary cluster node. If dev_ms and dev_enq logs are empty and sapstartsrv is not running, it means the SAP start service (sapstartsrv) itself failed to launch or access its necessary files before it could even write initial logs or start the Enqueue process. This usually points to an issue with the cluster bringing up the shared filesystem resource or the permissions on it.
  - Specific Troubleshooting Steps:
    1. Verify Shared Filesystem Mount Status:
      - Action: On the secondary cluster node (where ASCS is failing to start), after the failover attempt, manually check if the /sapmnt/<SID> file system is correctly mounted and accessible. Use df -h /sapmnt/<SID> and ls -l /sapmnt/<SID>/profile.
      - Rationale: The cluster should bring up the shared filesystem before attempting to start SAP resources that depend on it. If it's not mounted, SAP cannot find its binaries or profiles.
    2. Check Permissions of /sapmnt/<SID>:
      - Action: Ensure the OS user sidadm and group sapsys (or sapinst) have full read/write/execute permissions on /sapmnt/<SID> and its subdirectories, specifically /sapmnt/<SID>/profile and kernel executables.
      - Action: Manually try to su - <sidadm> and navigate (cd) into /sapmnt/<SID>/profile and try to ls -l.
      - Rationale: Incorrect permissions will prevent sapstartsrv from running or accessing critical files.
    3. Cluster Resource Dependencies:
      - Action: In Pacemaker (using crm status or crm configure show), verify that the ASCS resource (e.g., res_ASCS_S<SID>_ASCS<NN>) has a dependency on the virtual IP resource and the shared filesystem mount resource.
      - Rationale: Incorrect dependencies can lead to resources starting out of order.
    4. Cluster Logs (Deeper Dive):
      - Action: Examine the journalctl -u pacemaker and journalctl -u corosync logs on both cluster nodes for any errors related to the filesystem mount, virtual IP movement, or sapstartsrv execution. Look for systemd errors.
      - Rationale: These logs provide detailed insights into what the cluster manager tried to do and why it failed.
    5. Manual sapstartsrv Test:
      - Action: As sidadm on the secondary node, try to manually start sapstartsrv for the ASCS instance: sapstartsrv pf=/sapmnt/<SID>/profile/<SID>_ASCS<NN>_<hostname> (replace hostname with virtual hostname).
      - Check: Look for any immediate errors returned to the console or new entries in the dev_w0 (or dev_disp, dev_ms) for the startup attempt.
      - Rationale: This bypasses the cluster and directly tests if sapstartsrv can execute under the correct user and access its files. If this fails, the problem is definitively with the OS environment or sapstartsrv itself.
    6. Verify SAP Profile Consistency:
      - Action: Ensure the ASCS profile located on the shared /sapmnt is identical on both nodes and correctly points to the virtual hostname/IP.
      - Rationale: A corrupted or inconsistent profile could also prevent startup.
Scenario: Your Windows-based SAP ECC system uses WSFC for ASCS/ERS HA and a separate SQL Server AlwaysOn Availability Group (AG) for the database. During a major network fluctuation affecting only internal data center traffic, the ASCS cluster did not failover, but users experienced severe performance issues and intermittent "session lost" errors. The ASCS host remained active, and the SQL Server AG also remained primary on its original node.
- Q: Why might the ASCS cluster not failover despite network issues, and what specifically caused the performance issues and session loss without an actual cluster failover? How would you configure the cluster to be more sensitive to such network conditions?
- A:
  - Why ASCS Cluster Did Not Failover:
    - WSFC relies on network heartbeats and quorum to determine node health. If the network fluctuation was intermittent or not severe enough to cause a complete loss of heartbeat for a prolonged duration (beyond the configured cluster heartbeat threshold), the cluster might not have declared the primary node as 'down'.
    - Additionally, if the ASCS services themselves (Message Server, Enqueue Server) were still technically running on the primary node (even if struggling), the cluster's resource monitor might not have detected a service failure, hence no failover trigger. Fencing mechanisms might also not have activated if quorum was maintained.
  - Cause of Performance Issues and Session Loss:
    - Impact on Enqueue Server: Even if the ASCS service remained "up" on the primary node, the intermittent network issues likely caused loss of communication between the Enqueue Server and the application servers. The Enqueue Server manages locks, and if application servers cannot communicate with it consistently, they cannot acquire or release locks, leading to processes hanging or timing out. This directly impacts performance.
    - Impact on Message Server: Similarly, intermittent network issues affect the Message Server's ability to communicate with and load-balance application servers, leading to users being unable to log on, or existing sessions being "lost" if their connection to the ASCS Message Server (or the specific application server they are on) is severed.
    - Shared Storage (if applicable): If the ASCS resources depend on shared storage and the network fluctuation impacted storage connectivity (e.g., SMB shares over network), this could also lead to delays and hangs for ASCS access to its profile or global files.
    - Database Connectivity: While the SQL Server AG remained primary, if the network fluctuation affected the connection between the application servers and the SQL Server, that would also cause performance and session issues. However, the question points to ASCS behavior.
  - How to Configure Cluster for More Sensitivity:
    1. Reduce Heartbeat Thresholds:
      - Action: In WSFC, configure shorter heartbeat intervals and lower failure thresholds. (e.g., SameSubnetDelay, CrossSubnetDelay, SameSubnetThreshold, CrossSubnetThreshold).
      - Caution: Too aggressive settings can lead to "flapping" (unnecessary failovers) during transient network blips. Balance sensitivity with stability.
      - Rationale: Forces the cluster to declare a node unhealthy more quickly if heartbeats are missed.
    2. Enhance Resource Monitoring:
      - Action: Configure the ASCS service resources within WSFC to perform deeper health checks, not just basic service status. This might involve custom scripts that check specific SAP port availability (e.g., Enqueue port 3200) or respond to specific Message Server pings.
      - Rationale: Allows the cluster to detect application-level unresponsiveness even if the Windows service appears "running."
    3. Network Redundancy and Isolation:
      - Action: Ensure the cluster heartbeat network is physically separated from the general SAP communication network. Use dedicated NICs, switches, and potentially VLANs.
      - Action: Implement NIC teaming/bonding with redundant uplinks on all cluster nodes.
      - Rationale: Isolates cluster communication from application traffic, making heartbeats more reliable.
    4. rdisp/keepalive Parameter Tuning:
      - Action: Review and potentially lower the rdisp/keepalive parameter on application servers. This parameter controls how long an ABAP work process waits before terminating a session if communication is lost.
      - Rationale: Faster detection of lost sessions, though it doesn't prevent the underlying network issue.
    5. Quorum Configuration:
      - Action: Re-evaluate the quorum model (e.g., Node Majority, Node and Disk Witness, Node and File Share Witness) to ensure it's robust and not overly sensitive to single component failures during network issues.
      - Rationale: Ensures quorum can be maintained reliably, preventing spurious failovers or split-brain.
Scenario: You are planning a complex SAP migration from ECC on Oracle/AIX to S/4HANA on HANA/SLES. The target HA design includes Pacemaker for ASCS/ERS and synchronous HSR for HANA. Your management is concerned about the complexity of managing shared storage for /sapmnt on Linux in a clustered environment, especially given previous issues with NFS in other non-SAP Linux clusters.
- Q: As a Basis architect, how would you address the management's concerns about shared storage complexity for /sapmnt in this new S/4HANA HA landscape, specifically recommending a robust shared storage solution for SLES and outlining key considerations for its successful implementation and maintenance?
- A:
  - Addressing Concerns & Recommending Robust Shared Storage:
    - I would acknowledge the valid concerns about NFS, which can be prone to network issues, single points of failure at the NFS server, and performance bottlenecks if not configured optimally.
    - For a highly critical S/4HANA landscape on SLES with Pacemaker, I would primarily recommend using a Clustered Filesystem solution (e.g., OCFS2 or GFS2) or a highly resilient NFSv4 solution with dedicated network and advanced features.
    - Recommendation: GFS2 (Global File System 2) on top of a SAN (Storage Area Network) with multi-pathing.
      - Why GFS2?
        
        Active/Active Mounting: GFS2 allows the same filesystem to be mounted simultaneously (read-write) on multiple cluster nodes, which is ideal for HA. This eliminates the traditional NFS server as a single point of failure for the filesystem itself.
        
        Direct SAN Access: It leverages direct access to SAN LUNs (Logical Unit Numbers) via Fiber Channel or iSCSI, providing higher performance and lower latency than typical network-attached NFS.
        
        Clustering Integration: GFS2 is tightly integrated with Pacemaker/Corosync, allowing the cluster to manage its fencing and integrity.
        
        Designed for HA: It's built for shared storage in clustered environments, addressing consistency and concurrency issues.
  - Key Considerations for Successful Implementation and Maintenance of GFS2 (or similar):
    1. Underlying SAN Infrastructure:
      - Redundancy: Ensure the SAN itself has redundant controllers, power supplies, and network paths (multi-pathing via device mapper multipath DM-MP) from the SLES servers to the SAN.
      - Performance: Sufficient IOPS and throughput from the SAN for sapmnt (especially for kernel swaps, logs, profiles).
    2. Clustering Integration:
      - Resource Definition: The GFS2 filesystem resource must be defined and managed by Pacemaker, ensuring it's mounted correctly during cluster startup and failovers.
      - Fencing: The cluster's fencing mechanism (STONITH) is critical to ensure data integrity with GFS2, preventing a split-brain.
    3. Correct Sizing:
      - Allocate sufficient disk space for /sapmnt/<SID> (including profile, global, exe, data, log directories if not separate) to accommodate growth and potential patches/upgrades.
    4. Network Configuration for SAN:
      - Dedicated Network: Fiber Channel (FC) or dedicated iSCSI network for storage connectivity, separate from the public network.
      - Jumbo Frames: For iSCSI, configure jumbo frames for better performance if supported end-to-end.
    5. Patching and Maintenance:
      - Planned Outages: Maintenance of the shared storage layer (firmware upgrades, controller replacements) requires careful planning and coordination to avoid impacting the SAP system.
      - OS Patches: OS patches on SLES nodes must be compatible with GFS2 and the cluster software.
    6. Monitoring:
      - Implement comprehensive monitoring of GFS2 filesystem health, SAN performance, and multi-pathing status.
      - Monitor cluster resource states for the GFS2 mount point.
    7. Documentation:
      - Thorough documentation of the GFS2 setup, cluster configuration, and troubleshooting procedures.
    8. Expertise:
      - Ensure the Basis and Linux/Storage teams have the necessary expertise in GFS2, Pacemaker, and SAN storage management.
Scenario: Your SAP system is running on AIX with Oracle Database. You have implemented Oracle RAC for database HA and a proprietary cluster solution (e.g., IBM PowerHA) for ASCS. During a recent maintenance window, a network segment experienced a brief outage, which surprisingly caused an unplanned failover of your Oracle RAC database, but the ASCS instance remained stable on its original node.
- Q: Explain why an Oracle RAC might failover due to a network outage that the ASCS cluster tolerates, and what specific configuration differences typically account for this behavior in a highly available SAP landscape.
- A:
  - Reason for Oracle RAC Failover during Network Outage:
    - Interconnect Sensitivity: Oracle RAC's core functionality relies heavily on a high-speed, low-latency, and highly reliable private interconnect network between its nodes. This interconnect is used for Cache Fusion (transferring data blocks between instances), cluster heartbeat, and resource locking. Even brief, intermittent disruptions on this critical private network can be interpreted by Oracle Clusterware as a node failure, triggering a failover or node eviction, even if the public network (used by ASCS or application servers) is stable or only briefly interrupted.
    - Voting Disk/Quorum: Oracle Clusterware also uses voting disks (shared storage) or a quorum mechanism. If a node loses communication to a sufficient number of voting disks or other cluster members via the interconnect, it might be evicted from the cluster to maintain data integrity.
    - Aggressive Health Checks: Oracle Clusterware often has very aggressive and low-latency health checks configured internally to ensure immediate response to node unresponsiveness, which can lead to faster failovers than generic OS-level cluster monitoring.
  - Specific Configuration Differences Accounting for This Behavior:
    1. Private Interconnect for RAC vs. Public Network for ASCS:
      - RAC: Has a dedicated, redundant, highly performant private network (interconnect) for internal cluster communication. Issues on this specific network are critical for RAC.
      - ASCS Cluster: Typically relies on the public network for heartbeats and communication between nodes. While important, the public network is often more tolerant of brief fluctuations than the low-latency demands of the RAC interconnect.
    2. Cluster Thresholds and Sensitivities:
      - Oracle Clusterware: By default or by design, often has very low thresholds for interconnect latency or missed heartbeats (e.g., milliseconds) due to the real-time nature of Cache Fusion and transactional integrity.
      - ASCS Cluster (e.g., PowerHA): While configurable, its heartbeat and failure detection thresholds might be less aggressive (e.g., seconds rather than milliseconds) because it's managing service availability rather than real-time distributed database consistency.
    3. Nature of Resources Monitored:
      - Oracle RAC: Monitors deep internal database processes, interconnect health, and voting disk accessibility, which are highly sensitive to network integrity.
      - ASCS Cluster: Primarily monitors the state of the ASCS instance process (sapstartsrv, Message Server, Enqueue Server) and the availability of its virtual IP and shared storage. These checks might be less granular or less immediately reactive to brief network blips.
    4. Fencing/Eviction Mechanisms:
      - Oracle RAC: Employs strong internal eviction mechanisms (often called STONITH or i/o fencing) to quickly remove a problematic node from the cluster to protect data consistency, even if it's a transient network issue.
      - ASCS Cluster: Also uses fencing, but its triggers or response times might be configured differently based on the criticality of the service it's protecting.
    5. SQLNET.ORA and TNSNAMES.ORA (if not using Listener AG):
      - The SAP application servers' tnsnames.ora configuration might point to a listener that failed, or sqlnet.ora parameters like SQLNET.EXPIRE_TIME could affect how long connections are kept alive. However, this impacts client connectivity, not the internal RAC failover itself.
  - Conclusion: The key difference lies in the extreme sensitivity of Oracle RAC's internal interconnect and health checks, which are designed to maintain transactional integrity across nodes with zero data loss, making them more susceptible to even minor network glitches on their dedicated internal network than a typical ASCS cluster's monitoring of the public network.
Scenario: You are performing a system copy of a production SAP S/4HANA system to a new HA-enabled quality assurance (QA) environment (SLES/HANA, Pacemaker/HSR). After the system copy (based on backup/restore), you attempt to start the QA ASCS instance on the primary cluster node, but it fails to start. The dev_w0 logs show "NI_PConnect: hostname '<virtual_ascs_hostname>' unknown" and the kernel reports "hostname resolution failed". However, ping <virtual_ascs_hostname> works perfectly fine from both cluster nodes, resolving to the correct virtual IP.
- Q: Identify the most likely root cause for the "hostname unknown" error specifically within the SAP kernel context during ASCS startup, despite successful ping resolution, and outline the exact Basis configuration changes required to rectify this.
- A:
  - Most Likely Root Cause: The most likely root cause for "hostname unknown" within the SAP kernel, despite ping working, is an issue with the host entries in the /etc/hosts file on the cluster nodes, particularly entries related to the virtual hostname of the ASCS or other SAP-relevant hostnames (such as the database virtual hostname, or application server hostnames if they are referenced directly in profiles).
    - Why ping works but SAP fails: ping primarily relies on DNS resolution. The SAP kernel, especially during startup, often performs hostname lookups, and its internal caching or specific lookup order (e.g., prioritizing /etc/hosts before DNS) might cause it to fail if the /etc/hosts file is incomplete or incorrect. During a system copy, /etc/hosts might not be automatically adapted to the new virtual hostnames or the new QA environment's specific network configuration.
  - Exact Basis Configuration Changes Required to Rectify:
    1. Correct /etc/hosts on All Cluster Nodes:
      - Action: On both the primary and secondary cluster nodes for the QA system, open the /etc/hosts file.
      - Verify/Add Entries: Ensure the following entries are correctly present and match the QA environment's virtual IPs and hostnames:
        
        <Virtual_ASCS_IP> <virtual_ascs_hostname>
        
        <Virtual_HANA_DB_IP> <virtual_hana_db_hostname> (if applicable, which it is for HSR)
        
        <Physical_Node1_IP> <physical_node1_hostname>
        
        <Physical_Node2_IP> <physical_node2_hostname>
        
        Any other virtual IPs/hostnames referenced in SAP profiles.
      - Order: The order of entries in /etc/hosts can sometimes matter. It's good practice to place static entries for SAP components at the top.
      - Example (simplified):
        # ASCS Virtual Hostname 10.10.10.101 qas_ascs_vh # HANA DB Virtual Hostname 10.10.10.102 qas_hana_vh # Physical Node 1 10.10.10.11 qas_node1 # Physical Node 2 10.10.10.12 qas_node2
      - Rationale: The SAP kernel often relies on /etc/hosts for critical hostname resolution during startup, particularly for virtual hostnames associated with clustered resources. If this file is incorrect or missing entries, it can lead to startup failures even if DNS is configured properly.
    2. Verify SAP Profile Parameters:
      - Action: Double-check the DEFAULT.PFL and ASCS instance profile located on the shared /sapmnt/<SID>/profile directory.
      - Verify: Ensure that rdisp/mshost, enq/serverhost, and any other hostname-dependent parameters point exactly to the new QA virtual hostnames (e.g., qas_ascs_vh) and not the old production ones or physical hostnames.
      - Rationale: The profile dictates what hostnames the ASCS instance tries to resolve.
    3. Cluster Resource Definition (Cross-Check):
      - Action: In Pacemaker, verify that the virtual IP resource definition for the ASCS correctly assigns the new QA virtual IP and hostname.
      - Rationale: Ensures consistency between the OS, DNS, and cluster configuration.
    4. No resolv.conf Changes (usually):
      - While resolv.conf is for DNS, typically, for direct "hostname unknown" from kernel, the /etc/hosts is the first place to check before DNS. The problem states ping works, implying DNS is fine.

This detailed approach ensures comprehensive coverage of HA configuration, troubleshooting, and design considerations in SAP Basis.

Rakshit Ranjan Singh

Search This Blog